Shadowrun

Shadowrun General => Gear => Topic started by: Senko on <06-12-15/1237:24>

Title: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: Senko on <06-12-15/1237:24>
As the title say's sticking a cheaper dongle in a comlink which is a better attribute to add attack, sleeze, up to the preson?
Title: Re: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: Kincaid on <06-12-15/1435:15>
Sleaze will be the popular choice, I assume.  You don't automatically alert folks to your presence, can hide reasonably well, and have a pretty good selection of Matrix actions.  No Crack File hurts, but that's about it.
Title: Re: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: Senko on <06-12-15/1523:27>
As a result of the other thread I'm now debating if it'd actually be useful for a secondary decker or if you'd be better of getting the lower rating deck for the program running . . . 50k deck vs 50k comlink with no programs.
Title: Re: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: firebug on <06-12-15/2349:50>
This depends entirely on what a "secondary decker" is.  Attack actions and Sleaze actions can happen almost independantly of eachother in various situations (except where Crack File comes into play).

If your role is to cover for the normal decker for something like...  "Hey, I need to search the host for the file, can you mark and control cameras and doors while I do this?" then Sleaze would be the way to go.  You are there to do the light lifting and ditch if things get heavy/heated. 

If you're backup for if things go badly, then Attack can be the way to go.  "Oh shit, I got spotted!  Senko, get in here and help me fend off the IC while I finish the job!"  Alternatively, you can be the overwatch guy.  You're staying in the meat, using your Attack to brick things and cause mayhem and take out potential threats and screwing enemy communication while the primary decker works their magic on the matrix or in the host.
Title: Re: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: Senko on <06-13-15/0011:30>
More the first one so sleeze then, appeals to me on a personal level too. Thanks.
Title: Re: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: I_AM_ZHOUL!!! on <06-15-15/1412:40>
Sleaze Dongle (2 or 3) with a Virtual Machine Program Module modification in a Transys Avalon or Fairlight Caliban & a high rated Agent program (4+) makes a better "secondary hacker" than a PC ever would. They can run a constant Matrix Perception, check your Persona for Marks, Reboot your PAN if they find any (no Attack to Erase Marks),  Hack on the Fly against non-deckers, which leads to Reformat Device & Reboot Device (again no Attack so only Sleaze actions).... all on the Agents Matrix Initiative Passes not sucking up valuable PC actions they will be inferior at doing anyways. Doing this setup also gives a non decker the most useful utility cyberprogram around... Wrapper.
Title: Re: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: Senko on <06-15-15/1613:01>
Hmmmm expensive but tempting, especially if you can make the agent your personal secretary as per that variant Comlink as well. Managing your appointments, waking you up, etc, etc.
Title: Re: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: SichoPhiend on <06-15-15/1630:04>
Don't Overlook the value of Attack, using the same idea of an attack dongle, Virtual Machine and an agent, you can set it to start bricking your opponents in a fight.  Even if all you do is 'encourage' them to shut their wireless off it's helpful.  Sometimes making them forego those extra 2 smartlink dice is all you need.

Eventually, when I have the cash, I intend to have both dongles and switch as the situation demands.
Title: Re: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: I_AM_ZHOUL!!! on <06-15-15/1708:23>
Hmmmm expensive but tempting, especially if you can make the agent your personal secretary as per that variant Comlink as well. Managing your appointments, waking you up, etc, etc.

Not expensive at all to do what you are describing  (what I currently have on my Face.)  That's a Fairlight VM modified with a Agent 3 (¥3000) & Sleaze Dongle 1 (¥3000) that way he can hack onto grids for me, Matrix Perception tests, & Matrix Searches in teamwork tests. Nothing fancy cause that takes investing about ¥60,000 to accomplish. Which is still a better (or at least substantially cheaper in Character Resources) than using a Little Hornet with a PC who has low skill ratings & average Attributes.
Title: Re: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: Senko on <06-15-15/2353:17>
Ah I was thinking 3/4 for the sleeze dangle that'd be the difference in price. Oh for the karma/nuyen to make a proper mage/decker.
Title: Re: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: Rooks on <06-16-15/0040:35>
I always liked this PAN set up used for my rigger:

This will have a persona/character running it so you can hide or sneak marks on it
EvoTech Himitsu 8R 11,000¥
sleaze 5
Receiver Dongle 3 400¥ -2 noise
Add a Module 500¥
Program Carrier 900¥
Virtual Machine
Signal Scrub 80¥ -2 noise
Smoke and Mirrors 250¥
Effective Sleaze Rating of 9

Total cost 13130 ¥


Nixdorf Sekretär 4 6 2 5 4,000¥ 2 6
Rating 3 Agent
Data proc 6
Ticker
Add a Module 500
Program Carrier 900
Virtual machine
Browse 80
Search 80

Total cost 5560¥ Room for dongle too

Effective Data Processing of 8+ Rating 3 Agents computer skill 11 dice pool plus divides search time by half and the agent is doing it so you can still run hide/do other things

all slave to

Transys Avalon 5,000¥
6 Data Processing 6 Firewall
Add a Module 500¥
Program Carrier 900¥
Virtual machine
Armor 250¥
Agent (Rating 3) 9  3,000¥

Total 9650¥
Effective firewall rating of 8 + 3 agent skill rating 11 room for dongle


Grand total cost 28340¥ for a network of commlinks with fire wall 11 to resist damage 9+users skill for stealth actions and 8+3 11 dice pool for matrix search functions with effective deck stats of data processing 6 firewall 6 stealth 9

unless the dongle takes up the cyberprogram carrier slot
Title: Re: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: Senko on <06-16-15/0155:44>
Hmmmm what if you swapped the noise reduction dangle on the himitsu for an attack dongle? If you have the money a rating 3/4 attack dongle would give you options on how to go about things, alternatively a cable tap could also be a good choice. Hook it up to the vending machines data cable and make it think you payed for that food with no noise issues at all hmmm something I need to ask in another thread actually.. Maybe all 3 and swap them depending on the circumstances. Either way I like your pan and it's better value for money than the equivalent decks.
Title: Re: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: Rooks on <06-16-15/0226:08>
actually just re reading the matrix chapter its computer+stat limit is the data processing/sleaze so dice pools are about 8ish
Title: Re: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: Senko on <06-16-15/0231:01>
An 8 die pool isn't bad if your only a dabbler who hacks minor things rather than a decker breaking into secured areas.
Title: Re: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: Rooks on <06-16-15/0242:53>
Considering Riggers are screw over hardcore in this edition and can get hacked pretty easily with no recourse cause the RCC doesnt even have sleaze to hide your icon/person from being hacked
Title: Re: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: Senko on <06-16-15/0252:31>
It does seem odd there's nothing about variant/nodding decks. The next question is how to set them up, I'd probably have the sekretar as a watch form factor and my official commlink with the transys in some disguised format Image link glasses for the mage maybe or at higher levels (post initiation) replaced with an implanted fairlight but how to disguise the himitsu.. .
Title: Re: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: SichoPhiend on <06-16-15/1311:50>
Considering Riggers are screw over hardcore in this edition and can get hacked pretty easily with no recourse cause the RCC doesnt even have sleaze to hide your icon/person from being hacked

At least with data trails you can now put an add matrix attribute mod (combined with an increase attribute mod if you're willing to have the permanent matrix damage.)  By my interpretation this means that you could then run sleaze increasing software on the deck to further increase the sleaze rating.
Title: Re: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: Rooks on <06-16-15/2256:56>
Considering Riggers are screw over hardcore in this edition and can get hacked pretty easily with no recourse cause the RCC doesnt even have sleaze to hide your icon/person from being hacked

At least with data trails you can now put an add matrix attribute mod (combined with an increase attribute mod if you're willing to have the permanent matrix damage.)  By my interpretation this means that you could then run sleaze increasing software on the deck to further increase the sleaze rating.
Except page 66 says "Unless otherwise noted, a device can only have one modification." I understand your interpreting it another way I personally think you can increase a already existing stat as many times as you want cause the trade off is matrix condition boxes that cannot be repaired but until we have an errata its up to the GMs translation of the rules
Title: Re: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: Senko on <06-16-15/2315:51>
No increaes functions differently from other modules, see these sections on page 66.

Add a Matrix Attribute: You can add a rating that a device doesn’t have, specifically Attack or Sleaze. When you perform this mod, the rating starts at 1. You can’t add a Matrix attribute to a device that already has that attribute. Remember that all devices have Data Processing and Firewall, even if that information is not listed in their gear entry. The Increase a Matrix Attribute modification can later be added to this modification. The number of parts packs needed for this modification equals the (Device Rating x 2) of the object being modified.

So unlike the usual limits you can add an attribute and then increase it as for increase attribute its hard to say whether its stackable or one off. Personally I read it as having a limit of one point but this comes back to my current opinion a lot of these new options are actually fairly useless in practice.
Title: Re: Attack or Sleeze Dongle which is more use for a secondary decker?
Post by: Rooks on <06-17-15/0019:24>
Ah right you are finally a headway and a way for street level campaigns to still hack