I was just about to convert all the Arsenal 4th edition weapons to 5th edition rules for my shadowrun group when i stumbled over the rule for Machine Guns in the 5th edition.
I quickly compared machine guns to assault rifles and i couldn't grasp in which situation taking a MMG or LMG (especially a light one) would be viable.
Accuracy Dmg AP Mode RC Ammo Avail Price
AK97 5 10P -2 SA/BF/FA - 38(c) 4R 950
Yamaha Raiden 6 11P -2 SA/BF/FA 1 60(c) 14F 2,600
Ingram LMG 5 9P -2 BF/FA 2(3) 50(c) 12F 5,800
So basically the LMG is less accurate, does less damage and has a higher price than the Raiden. Even compared to one of the low-end assault weapons (the AK) the LMG sucks.
The slight benefit of the additional recoil reduction is pretty null and void as soon as you put a gasvent rating 2 in the Yamaha (same like the one used by the ingram LMG).
This comparison doesn't even include the negative effect that MGs stack recoil like crazy due to their special unresisted recoil x2 rule.
Am i missing something or do LMGs just make no sense in SR5 from a gameplay (not fluff) point of view? Please tell me that i missed something, i would be really glad
