NEWS

Seattle 2072

  • 8 Replies
  • 3550 Views

evil homer

  • *
  • Newb
  • *
  • Posts: 4
« on: <09-25-14/1613:55> »
I'm planning on running the Seattle season (4? I think) as the foundation of a home game.  Is Seattle 2072 a good starting place to fill in the gaps and give the missions some life outside of the 'living' system so to speak?

Namikaze

  • *
  • Freelancer Ltd
  • Prime Runner
  • **
  • Posts: 4068
  • I'm a Ma'fan of Shadowrun!
« Reply #1 on: <09-25-14/1625:05> »
Absolutely.  A lot of the material in Seattle 2072 is great stuff for Season 4, and even for non-Missions games that take place in 2075.
Feel free to keep any karma you earned illicitly, it's on us.

Quote from: Stephen Covey
Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.

evil homer

  • *
  • Newb
  • *
  • Posts: 4
« Reply #2 on: <09-25-14/1644:39> »
Thanks.  I'm looking for a meaty foundation to build on.  Most of the review's I've read have been very positive towards the Seattle 2072 book and I figure its current enough to make it work, especially because I don't see our group being overly concerned with continuity issues.  Keep the opinions coming.  I've already purchased the 6th world Alamanc for some world foundation stuff, so far I've been enjoying that as well.

Michael Chandra

  • *
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Prime Runner
  • ***
  • Posts: 9944
  • Question-slicing ninja
« Reply #3 on: <09-25-14/1659:24> »
The only real changes in Seattle since then, that I personally know of that is, seem to be caused by Season 4. :)
How am I not part of the forum?? O_O I am both active and angry!

Bull

  • *
  • Ace Runner
  • ****
  • Posts: 2449
  • Crotchety Old Ork Decker
« Reply #4 on: <09-25-14/2156:12> »
I would recommend the original Seattle Sourcebook as well, just for the sheer flavor of it all.  But yeah, generally speaking Seattle 2072 was our base source material for Season 4 of Missions, and we built up from there. 

Namikaze

  • *
  • Freelancer Ltd
  • Prime Runner
  • **
  • Posts: 4068
  • I'm a Ma'fan of Shadowrun!
« Reply #5 on: <09-25-14/2215:27> »
Honestly, whoever wrote the Seattle 2072 book deserves a damn medal.  All of those that worked on it, from art to layout to content - it's one of my favorite Shadowrun books of all time.
Feel free to keep any karma you earned illicitly, it's on us.

Quote from: Stephen Covey
Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.

Michael Chandra

  • *
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Prime Runner
  • ***
  • Posts: 9944
  • Question-slicing ninja
« Reply #6 on: <09-26-14/0534:27> »
Yeah, I've been checking in on it recently, to give my players more depth and make sure I don't contradict existing Organised Crime lore but work with it instead. It's an awesome book.
How am I not part of the forum?? O_O I am both active and angry!

Tarislar

  • *
  • Ace Runner
  • ****
  • Posts: 1820
  • Uzi's + Fireballs .... Why I love Shadowrun!
« Reply #7 on: <09-26-14/1636:02> »
I don't have the original Seattle book, but I do have Seattle 2060.  Is there a lot different from then ?


Bull

  • *
  • Ace Runner
  • ****
  • Posts: 2449
  • Crotchety Old Ork Decker
« Reply #8 on: <09-26-14/1933:30> »
Different focuses, mainly.  The original Seattle Sourcebook was the first, it it has some really serious style and panache.  New Seattle is a good book, and a very solid update to the original, but I always felt it lacked the flare the original had.  Seattle 2072 is closer in style to the original, is a fantastic update to the setting, and ultimately is all you really need, but I still recommend checking out the classics when you get the chance.

The original is available on drivethrough as a PDF for $8 if you want a good read sometime.

http://rpg.drivethrustuff.com/product/109295/Shadowrun-Seattle-Sourcebook