Actually, here's the thing - a lot of what JoeNapalm ... err, sorry, CitizenJoe ... says
is fairly well workable within canon. The
problem is, and always has been, exactly what he's saying he does: treats everything written, even out-of-character behind-the-scenes game-level information, as being subject to what is called the 'unreliable narrator'. Take this for example:
The country of which Seattle is a part and of which Dunkelzahn was (for a short time) President is the United Canadian and American States, or 'UCAS'.
This, to everyone else, is game-world fact. For Joe, it's subject to 'unreliable narrator', and could just be a grand conspiracy. He then presents this viewpoint, without the proper addition of 'I think' or some such, to someone asking 'what's the name of the country of which Seattle is a part?'
Joe, unless people ask a question that says 'so in your game' or some variation, they want to know what the books say - what canon is. Canon is, by definition, what the books say. (See dictionary definitions of canon above.) If you'd like a fantastic example of how to successfully present a wacky theory on the boards, see
this post - the very first post ever on these boards by a brand-spanking-new individual. S/He already has earned more interest and respect than you have, just for the words 'I've always believed that'.