Whoever calculated at 1% is massively incorrect. The US currently supports about 35k personnel that are "shadow runner" levels of good (despite the hype, most of high-end organizations are analysts, support personnel, managers, etc.). Lets give some state and municipal agencies the benefit of the doubt and double that. We'll even throw in an extra 30k private sector types - programmers, NRA shooting champs, etc. etc. . 100k all together.
Where did you pull these numbers from? 35,000 that are "shadow runner levels of good"? How do you define that and why 35,000?
Anyone can be a shadowrunner at nearly any skill level. I once had a character that was a history professor that became a shadowrunner by necessity. He had nearly no useful skills to start.
Obviously the exception, but my point is that there is probably no such thing as "shadow runner levels of good".
Looking back at my spreadsheet (I have one for creating the overall runner population) I see it says 1 in 5000 people are runners.
That makes for about 1200 runners in Seattle. That's not all that many, particularly if you break it down by archetype or race.
If you assume 10% of runners are mages that's only around 120.
OK.. I found the original reference for my number... so rewriting what I wrote here..
The original was from the 2nd Neo-Anarchists Guide to Everything Else (NAGEE).
The article was called "The Economics of Shadowrunning". I'm not saying it is gospel or anything, but had some reasonable logic.
For the interest of people here I will cut and paste the article below the original author was Earl A. Hubbell
His article was written way back when it was 2050. The population of Seattle is now around 6 million not 3 million.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract: Statistical analysis applied with some wild assumptions demonstrates
1) Shadowrunners are not generally a significant force and
2) They are an economic preferred alternative to 'in-house' operatives, despite general unreliability.
Seattle of 2050:
Population : 3x10
6 individuals
Corporate affiliated: 1.5x10
6Below Poverty: 1x10
6Thus, we see economically independent units compose 5x10
5 individuals. We rule out the 'Below Poverty Level' population, as any significantly skilled/cybered/magic unit will be aggressively recruited/have entered poverty voluntarily/will not be counted in standard census.
From the UCAS census estimates, we have approximately 1% of the population having 'significant' cyber-enhancements (so called 'samurai', 'riggers' or 'deckers') or significant magical enhancement ('physical adepts'). Full mages compose approximately .1% of the population.
Thus, there are approximately 3x10
4 units of significant personal power in Seattle. Of these units, 3,000 are mages. Due to aggressive corporate recruiting, it is estimated that only 10% of the 'significant' population may be considered 'independent'. Thus, we have 3x10
3 significant units, of which 300 are mages.
For obvious reasons, counting this population is difficult, however, it seems that only approximately 20% of this final group engage in high-risk operations (the remaining 'independents' belonging to various 'normal' occupations).
Thus, the 'significant' population available to 'shadowrun' consists of merely 60 mages, 60 skilled 'deckers', approximately 120 riggers, 120 physical adepts, and 300 samurai (numbers do not add due to some overlap in categories, and approximation errors).
Given the near-necessity of 'magical cover' on any significant operation, we see an operating population of approximately 100 'teams' of runners within Seattle, composed from a pool of approximately 600 'powered' individuals, and approximately 2,000 skilled personnel in various 'support' positions (so-called 'fixers', 'detectives', 'security consultants', 'cannon-fodder'...)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There was more, but I didn't want to make this post much bigger.
