NEWS

Armor modification stacking

  • 16 Replies
  • 7603 Views

mtfeeney = Baron

  • *
  • Ace Runner
  • ****
  • Posts: 1389
  • I love crunchy numbers
« on: <05-07-13/0219:24> »
If you have rating 3 insulation on your armor and rating 3 insulation on your FFBA, does it function as a total of rating 6?  Or is it just rating 3 and the second modification is worthless?
Remember, you don't have to kill the vehicle to stop it, just kill the guy driving it.

Medicineman

  • *
  • Ace Runner
  • ****
  • Posts: 2310
« Reply #1 on: <05-07-13/0221:50> »
there is no RAW for it

In My Groups we stack it  'til Level 6

with a Lvl 6 Dance
Medicineman
http://english.bouletcorp.com/2013/08/02/the-long-journey/
---------------------------------------------------
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1V7fi5IqYw
---------------------------------------------------
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RYlAPjyNm8

Reaver

  • *
  • Prime Runner
  • *****
  • Posts: 6424
  • 60% alcohol 40% asshole...
« Reply #2 on: <05-07-13/0310:12> »
If you have rating 3 insulation on your armor and rating 3 insulation on your FFBA, does it function as a total of rating 6?  Or is it just rating 3 and the second modification is worthless?

I apply the 50% effectiveness rule if mods are on different pieces of armor... But that's just me and my house rule after some fairly silly abuses came up at my table....

As medicineman said, there is no RAW for it either way...
Where am I going? And why am I in a hand basket ???

Remember: You can't fix Stupid. But you can beat on it with a 2x4 until it smartens up! Or dies.

Mantis

  • *
  • Omae
  • ***
  • Posts: 586
« Reply #3 on: <05-07-13/0315:03> »
For our table we just add enough of a given mod to replace what you usually lose from the typical 1/2 impact armour penalty these types of attacks inflict. So if you have a lined coat for example, we'd typically add 2 points of whatever to it to compensate for the 4 impact getting halved when hit by an elemental attack. That way you usually end up rolling whatever your impact would normally be.
But otherwise, yeah, no RAW for this. Just do whatever causes the least headaches.

emsquared

  • *
  • Ace Runner
  • ****
  • Posts: 1029
  • Super Perfundo
« Reply #4 on: <05-07-13/1958:31> »
We don't stack it. Why? Because a 6 and 6 dual layer would be 12 resistance (and more layers - orthoskin; which explicitly stacks/modifies - would allow even more), which is healthily above the RAW max rating and therefore, we interpret, disbalanced. However I really could see it go either way if you want to help out mundane a and/or downplay SnS.

mtfeeney = Baron

  • *
  • Ace Runner
  • ****
  • Posts: 1389
  • I love crunchy numbers
« Reply #5 on: <05-07-13/2200:38> »
I think it would still be limited to the RAW maximum rating of 6.
Remember, you don't have to kill the vehicle to stop it, just kill the guy driving it.

emsquared

  • *
  • Ace Runner
  • ****
  • Posts: 1029
  • Super Perfundo
« Reply #6 on: <05-07-13/2232:57> »
I think it would still be limited to the RAW maximum rating of 6.
Still isn't consistent with the closest similar mechanic (B/I Armor) where only the highest rating applies. Then again, maybe that isn't the closest similar mechanic?
« Last Edit: <05-07-13/2236:09> by emsquared »

mtfeeney = Baron

  • *
  • Ace Runner
  • ****
  • Posts: 1389
  • I love crunchy numbers
« Reply #7 on: <05-07-13/2304:50> »
Yep, and that's how I initially for to this point. Armor doesn't stack, but reason tells me that two layers of insulation would dual up to a maximum level of efficiency.
Remember, you don't have to kill the vehicle to stop it, just kill the guy driving it.

emsquared

  • *
  • Ace Runner
  • ****
  • Posts: 1029
  • Super Perfundo
« Reply #8 on: <05-07-13/2323:42> »
Yep, and that's how I initially for to this point. Armor doesn't stack, but reason tells me that two layers of insulation would dual up to a maximum level of efficiency.
Are you just doing this for Insulation? Or Non-conductivity and fire resistance, too?

An analog I can give you from real-life (since it sounds like you're trying to apply RL logic to this abstract game mechanic) is that for job-sites where you are required to wear Fire-Resistant Clothing, they have several different increasing ratings, a rating 2 might be adequate for an open-air gas-production facility, a rating 4 requirement might be mandatory in, say, a sub-surface mine where the atmosphere can be explosive. You cannot wear 2 layers of rating 2 FRC and still meet the OSHA requirement - you have to have the rating 4 FRC. Which is to say, I think these things (levels of protection) tend to be graded on an exponential scale, not linear. Stacking is linear.

Ultimately, as with all of these unclear rules, you should do what works best for your table. If you allow stacking, you could be slightly compromising (i.e. providing a loop-hole) to armor modification rules, by essentially letting low capacity armors do more (i.e. take some of the load off of higher capacity armors), which in turn will ultimately largely just benefit Mundanes vs. Awakened (not a bad thing if you think it's already Magic-run). Don't allow the stacking and you're applying Occam's Razor and, IMO, following the closest analog.
« Last Edit: <05-07-13/2332:45> by emsquared »

Ninja137

  • *
  • Chummer
  • **
  • Posts: 134
« Reply #9 on: <05-08-13/0001:58> »
Yep, and that's how I initially for to this point. Armor doesn't stack, but reason tells me that two layers of insulation would dual up to a maximum level of efficiency.
Are you just doing this for Insulation? Or Non-conductivity and fire resistance, too?

An analog I can give you from real-life (since it sounds like you're trying to apply RL logic to this abstract game mechanic) is that for job-sites where you are required to wear Fire-Resistant Clothing, they have several different increasing ratings, a rating 2 might be adequate for an open-air gas-production facility, a rating 4 requirement might be mandatory in, say, a sub-surface mine where the atmosphere can be explosive. You cannot wear 2 layers of rating 2 FRC and still meet the OSHA requirement - you have to have the rating 4 FRC. Which is to say, I think these things (levels of protection) tend to be graded on an exponential scale, not linear. Stacking is linear.

Ultimately, as with all of these unclear rules, you should do what works best for your table. If you allow stacking, you could be slightly compromising (i.e. providing a loop-hole) to armor modification rules, by essentially letting low capacity armors do more (i.e. take some of the load off of higher capacity armors), which in turn will ultimately largely just benefit Mundanes vs. Awakened (not a bad thing if you think it's already Magic-run). Don't allow the stacking and you're applying Occam's Razor and, IMO, following the closest analog.

It basically is Mage-run, though. Magic offers so much more than mundane, with so few drawbacks, that there is little reason to choose mundane/augs over magic aside from flavor.

mtfeeney = Baron

  • *
  • Ace Runner
  • ****
  • Posts: 1389
  • I love crunchy numbers
« Reply #10 on: <05-08-13/0013:32> »
Food for thought.  Thanks for the feedback guys.
Remember, you don't have to kill the vehicle to stop it, just kill the guy driving it.

emsquared

  • *
  • Ace Runner
  • ****
  • Posts: 1029
  • Super Perfundo
« Reply #11 on: <05-08-13/0050:32> »
... there is little reason to choose mundane/augs over magic aside from flavor.
Not really true at all as a unilateral statement. Drain can be a bitch, and a GM should use Background Counts from time to time, plus 'ware does a lot of things really cheaply for no Drain at all, running constantly.

Magical offense is hard to defend against - that's really it, IMO the only time things become Magic-run is when Awakened are "over-present" in the game. But this probably isn't really the place to debate this.

JoeNapalm

  • *
  • Ace Runner
  • ****
  • Posts: 1309
  • Ifriti Sophist
« Reply #12 on: <05-08-13/0937:09> »
We don't stack it. Why? Because a 6 and 6 dual layer would be 12 resistance (and more layers - orthoskin; which explicitly stacks/modifies - would allow even more), which is healthily above the RAW max rating and therefore, we interpret, disbalanced. However I really could see it go either way if you want to help out mundane a and/or downplay SnS.


I haven't had my coffee, yet.

Are you suggesting that you can add armor modifications to Orthoskin?

-Jn-
Ifriti Sophist

Michael Chandra

  • *
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Prime Runner
  • ***
  • Posts: 9944
  • Question-slicing ninja
« Reply #13 on: <05-08-13/0941:26> »
Dragon hide adds a +2 against Fire, but it doesn't count as a level of Fire Resistance so it stacks anyway.
How am I not part of the forum?? O_O I am both active and angry!

emsquared

  • *
  • Ace Runner
  • ****
  • Posts: 1029
  • Super Perfundo
« Reply #14 on: <05-08-13/0955:05> »
I haven't had my coffee, yet.

Are you suggesting that you can add armor modifications to Orthoskin?

-Jn-
Ifriti Sophist
Heh, no.