[Senko]

Given my failure to make a shaman/decker I figured I'd try and work out what roles go together. So here's what I have so far in primary/secondary format. Feel free to correct if I'm wrong.

Shaman/Face
Decker/Rigger
Decker/physical adept
Face/sniper
Street Sam/mage
Rigger/Sniper

[SlowDeck]

Decker/Rigger

In order to do either one of these really well in a way that utterly fulfills the role, you need Resources A. They're more something where you pair two characters together.

[Senko]

I'd have thought you need resources or magic A for everything except a physical adept to be honest.

[ZeConster]

Not really: humans can easily afford a lower Magic priority if they think other stuff is more important. My Missions character, for instance, has Attributes A, and is therefore well-rounded attributes-wise: 3/3/3/3/5/4/5/6.

[Senko]

Oh there are exceptions I just feel in general you want either magic or resources at A.

[ZeConster]

There's a difference between "most of the time" and "everything", though.

[mjack]

Oh there are exceptions I just feel in general you want either magic or resources at A.

This might be your prefrence … Other players prioritise differently depending on their way of gaming or how their GM interprets (or just ignores) certain game aspects

And btw. I cannot think of a reasonable concept to make a Street Sam/Mage mix work.

[DigitalZombie]

Tank/enchanter (using the crazy high troll body to withstand bullets and heal drain from preparations)
B&E/rigger (if the table plays with those rules stating that its agility for sneaking/duelist blades/gunnery etc) (pg 238)

And of course minor roles like medic/armourer/EOD/forgerer etc would benefit from a hermetic mage/hacker/rigger and other logic builds

[Whiskeyjack]

Given my failure to make a shaman/decker I figured I'd try and work out what roles go together. So here's what I have so far in primary/secondary format. Feel free to correct if I'm wrong.

Shaman/Face
Decker/Rigger
Decker/physical adept
Face/sniper
Street Sam/mage
Rigger/Sniper

Mage/decker (mage primary) is very hard to pull off even as a hermetic but decker/mage (decker primary) is a lot easier if you use your actions on decking stuff, with magic as buff/backup/"passive" (summoning, support stuff + sustaining, instead of spellslinging).

It's important to keep in mind that not all shamans have to be faces, and not all faces have to be shamans (Sams can do it quite well).

Decker/rigger actually is not easy due to the wide variety of skills needed. And both decks and good RCCs are expensive (setting aside the expense of the control rig). Drones and vehicles can be expensive. So it really depends. Deckers can usually make great First Aid healers though with their high Logic.

Decker/physad works pretty well since powers are almost entirely passive.

Face/sniper I don't think is a great combo, I don't think a sniper hanging back will be able to do the cool stuff with Leadership or Intimidation at that kind of range. The skillsets don't match well unless the face also does B&E and would have Con, Disguise, Impersonation.

As an aside, the "sniper" is...a skill set that is valuable (stealth and longarms) paired with an archetype (the loner who hides high above and shoots in ambush from long range, after staking out a blind) that is largely impractical on runs. Most shadowrun combat, in my experience, occurs at short-range, frequently indoors, and it is the players who are usually ambushed, not the enemies. Not to say the sniper archetype doesn't have value sometimes, just that it usually doesn't work out the way most people envisions hen they think "sniper." Sniper rifles are still incredibly useful at short-range firefights, if bulky enough for concealability to be an issue.

Street sam/mage: hahaha noooooo. Sams are dependent on losing Essence for power vs mages are dependent on having high Essence....yeah that's a big no. However, if you're a Mystic Adept gish, you might have the right idea with the right pairing of spells and PP.

Rigger/sniper: same issues with snipers in general, except in the case where your actual "sniper" is a flying drone or four, that's more viable...until your drones get shot down, but that's the perpetual issue with the rigger. I'm not the most up on riggers and Remote Control vs Jumped In being better.

[SlowDeck]

Street sam/mage: hahaha noooooo. Sams are dependent on losing Essence for power vs mages are dependent on having high Essence....yeah that's a big no. However, if you're a Mystic Adept gish, you might have the right idea with the right pairing of spells and PP.

On that one, I have to disagree. A mystic adept could easily play the street sam/mage role. They pick adept powers to augment their physical abilities and spells to give them versatility.

[Whiskeyjack]

Street sam/mage: hahaha noooooo. Sams are dependent on losing Essence for power vs mages are dependent on having high Essence....yeah that's a big no. However, if you're a Mystic Adept gish, you might have the right idea with the right pairing of spells and PP.

On that one, I have to disagree. A mystic adept could easily play the street sam/mage role. They pick adept powers to augment their physical abilities and spells to give them versatility.

I agree with you on the Mystic Adept thing (thought I made that clear in my post). I just meant, pairing a traditional low-Essence, ware-dependent sam with a full magician is just a bad recipe because of all the ware gimping magic. If you want to pair sam and mage, Mystic Adept is the only real viable way (and even they might take <1 Ess worth of ware for boosts like cybereyes, without a huge deleterious effect).

[Mithlas]

Don't forget about Hermetic magician/mystic adept with any of Armourer, Medic, or Mechanic. Depending on how you make the build you can be either a support-focused build, or just have support as backup so you can give another reason to the checkpoint officer when explaining why you're trying to get across Denver.

There's also some synergy between a physical adept (or street sam) with something more of a close-combat focus and a breaking and entering expert.

[Furious Trope]

My GM and I rolled up a Technomancer/Face.

Pretty much useless physically, but a beast with sprites or socially.

The real limiter with this one is skill points. Skills A wasn't nearly enough.

[SlowDeck]

Street sam/mage: hahaha noooooo. Sams are dependent on losing Essence for power vs mages are dependent on having high Essence....yeah that's a big no. However, if you're a Mystic Adept gish, you might have the right idea with the right pairing of spells and PP.

On that one, I have to disagree. A mystic adept could easily play the street sam/mage role. They pick adept powers to augment their physical abilities and spells to give them versatility.

I agree with you on the Mystic Adept thing (thought I made that clear in my post). I just meant, pairing a traditional low-Essence, ware-dependent sam with a full magician is just a bad recipe because of all the ware gimping magic. If you want to pair sam and mage, Mystic Adept is the only real viable way (and even they might take <1 Ess worth of ware for boosts like cybereyes, without a huge deleterious effect).

You did; my apologies. I was replying while still half asleep. I'm surprised you didn't get a lecture on imaginary elephants; I've been told it's quite hilarious.

[Whiskeyjack]

Haha no worries. Just was concerned that my post was unclear or poorly phrased.

Don't forget about Hermetic magician/mystic adept with any of Armourer, Medic, or Mechanic. Depending on how you make the build you can be either a support-focused build, or just have support as backup so you can give another reason to the checkpoint officer when explaining why you're trying to get across Denver.

That is a pretty handy combo. Character that can do First Aid and then slap on a Heal spell for the remainder. Former DocWagon SINner maybe...