Sounds like I won't be purchasing Spy Games, since I chose, in my game, to take out Ghostwalker by having the Treaty nations stage a Thor strike backed by a joint conventional military operation. All this while the team was in Denver as part of DotA2.
Out of curiosity, what's the stated reason as to why the Treaty needs to be re-negotiated. I'm AFB right now.
Hey, nuking the dragon that shat on the treaty in the first place sounds like a great reason to renegotiate the treaty.
However, the idea of a GD showing up in the diplomatic flash-point city for all of North America, claiming it as his own personal fiefdom and just crapping all over several powerful nations' sovereignty just never struck me as a situation that would be accepted by the treaty nations.
Definitely. Such a ballsy, dick move would piss off a lot of powerful people and, Great Dragon or no, nobody can get away with such a thing unscathed.
For the most part, I just ignore or gloss over dragons in my games. I don't really care for dragons.
Yeah, I'm not terribly anti-dragon, they've got there places and uses, but, while blatant power-plays are to be expected, you do need to be able to back it up with something when you piss off a continent. Then again, maybe by kicking the Azzie's out, he didn't piss everyone off TOO much... Kind of a "yeah, you killed a bunch of folk on my part of Denver, but you also slaughtered them Azzies..."
Heck, the CAS at a minimum has a reason to support Ghostwalker's vision of Denver and take a look at where most modern day military bases are (hint, Southeast US and Texas), which kind of gives them an edge in supporting Ghostwalker... I could see it going both ways.
