What boggles my mind is how unnecessary it is. All the ill will and hard feeling created by the lack of Errata could be immediately countered by just investing a little bit of time. It doesn't even matter whose time, anyone can do it, the end product just has to be officially blessed by Catalyst. The main questions are already all catalogued right here in this forum, and a lot of them even have answers from the writers, but they're not "official".
Look at Games Workshop, the old Luddite grandpa of the tabletop world. They finally started producing FAQs/Errata again, on Facebook of all places, and it's been met with over a month of continued good press and player excitement. What did it take to do that? Virtually nothing. First, solicit questions from the players. Catalyst has already done that right here. Second, answer the questions. It doesn't matter what the answer is, only that the answer exists. Third, release the answers. They're making pretty little images to do that, but that's unnecessary. A word doc converted to a PDF would be sufficient.
I'm 100% sure if Catalyst offered, players on this forum would do every one of those steps except answer the questions that haven't been answered yet (compile the questions, compile the answers, create a pdf) and all Catalyst would have to do is say "Please do this" and then do their part of answering the remaining questions and releasing the resulting PDF officially. But no, cause reasons. I guess it doesn't have a direct impact on the bottom line like a new (poorly edited) release does. And the crazy thing is, people would forgive the poor editing if they'd just bother to release fixes with some semblance of timeliness.
It just doesn't make sense.

Maybe they'll sell/lose the license soon, but I won't hold my breath.