re: the leader thing
I'm not against the leader thing, in concept, but I do have a concern. (I should also admit I've never actually played a game with a designated leader, so the concept feels a bit strange to me, but I am willing to try something new--the strangeness to me is not my concern.)
My concern is that, say Jayde Moon posts at time T, the time that player A regularly has time to check on things and post is T+3 hours, but the time that the leader can regularly post is T+5 hours. If player A waits for the post by leader, then their next post may be the next day at T+3, which is already after Jayde Moon's most convenient time, such that each cycle of events could well end up taking two days rather than one. (or worse, Leader doesn't get a chance to respond until the next day at T-2, so almost nothing happens for nearly a day).
I'd like to hear from others who have done PbP with a formal party leader on how it worked out in practice? I'm entirely willing to believe that I'm fretting needlessly if there is evidence pointing that way. (It is also possible that I just need to be more patient .... and maybe J.M. could use the slower pace, given that he has four games on the bubble)
I'll respond IC once those who care to have commented here.