[忍]

I'm noticing that complex forms are coded with a L+0 which is different from spells being just F. Mechanically there's no difference, however I'm only curious if this difference is intentional and what it is to accomplish. If there is a reason for it then cool.

Im aware that this isn't a change or errata to any rules, but I bring this up only for the sake of quality.

[Patrick Goodman]

Enhanced clarity.

[忍]

Does that mean F spells are going to be brought in line to F+0?

[Patrick Goodman]

Almost certainly. I'm a big fan of consistency, and try to provide it where I can.

[Jack_Spade]

Almost certainly. I'm a big fan of consistency, and try to provide it where I can.

Oh, yeah, please. Consistency of terms is a big issue for rules mechanics. Keep up the good work.

[firebug]

Consistency across the board would fix a majority of problems in Shadowrun's rules.  Go Patrick!

[Quatar]

Consistency in SR? Blasphemy! Burn the witch!