I started using "non-mystic adepts" and "mystic adepts" awhile back.
I will try to use it more often (since we also have physical adepts, social adepts, etc).
Having said that, I think SR6 is a lot better at consistently using the same phrase and term when they mean the same thing. In SR5 it was more rule and anything else to
not use the same phrase or term when describing the same thing.
Actually.........!
This edition seem to be quite consistent at using the word Mystical Adept when they talk about Mystical Adept. When they are not talking about Mystical Adept they are using the word Adept.
There are many places where something will apply to both Mystical Adept and Adept but in most of them (all of them?) they actually mention that the rule applies to both Adepts and Mystical Adepts.
If you take a strict reading as Adept mean non-mystic adept rather than both [Physical] Adept and Mystical Adept the rules actually seem to stay consistent.
There are two places where this might or might not be intended though.
First we have Qi Focus. The book says it is only for Adepts. Not Adepts and Mystic Adepts. Maybe it is actually intended that Mystic Adepts does not have access to Qi focus?
Second we have Power Point Metamagic. The book says it is only for Adepts. Not Adepts and Mystic Adepts. Maybe it is actually intended that Mystic Adepts does not have access to Power Point Metamagic?
That would severely limit the number of power points a mystic adept can get (max four and all four of them are during chargen) but it would also put a big limiting factor on their power curve.
Compared to a full Magician they are trading 1-4 power points for the ability to use astral projection and having to waste one of the few power points if they wish to get astral perception.
Compared to a non-mystic Adept they are limiting them self to only 1-4 power points (all during chargen) but instead they have the option to cast spells and summon spirits.
Huh.... This is actually quite interesting...
