[Netzgeist]

In fact, I can show our driver the exploit I used, since I probed the target (at least, Unwired says I may do so for a while). It does not appear to me as a good choice of action, but I may. Creating some new accounts and hiding them seem way more interesting.

But a question:
By Unwired rules, I may create a legit Account with a Software + Editing test, as I have security clearance. If I haven't, it would be a Hacking + Edit (2) test. Even though not having a security account would theoretically be more difficult, Fractal is more used to do things the wrong way (or, game-mechanically speaking, I have no Software skill and my hacking skill is enough for me to think it would be best if I had not the security account). So, what I'm wanting to ask is if I can take the test as if I haven't the security privilege, since it will benefit me at the time. Also, Unwired states this rules for creating an user account. For a security level access, we should raise it to 3, and for admin to 4. The thing is: this is for the hacking test (user without security privileges) or for the software test (security access or better)?

I will (I will post something IC before that, don't you freak) try to create this accounts, but I wanted them to be security or admin access. I just didn't really understand the rules for this. Someone can give its interpretation and clarify the question?

Sentinemodo, creeating user accounts is at the subitem backdoors, pg. 97.

[Sichr]

I seriously suggest reading the chapter "hacker tricks" in unwired before making new accounts.

Could you be more specific? I've just scanned the chapter, but found nothing relating to creating user accounts

p. 97

[Sichr]

I thing that it means (in combiunation with Edit, p230 SRA) you need to do Extended Edit test...

[JDA]

Been swamped at work last 2 days. will get caught up and provide info. tonight.

[Kouryuu]

can we block their Communications?
this is very important, for me at least.

Yes. Well...Maybe...at least those who are close enought With their node it should be much better, we will stop the message before it leaves out. I didnt find any other hiden node, and there is no other powerfull signal source, so Im assuming (and that may be dangerous) that Guards are using factory node for comunications. SI hadnt catched their outgoing call to PuebSec, but Im only able ti intercept wirless comuniation in the nodes Im close to, so the guard to guard it should be, but otherwise not. Right now.

more to do then, need to be at leat 85% sure, not in buissnes to be swarmed by armed guards in the dozens
homework, sweet homework

Braking into:

A) Getting into trough the second gate, picking the lock if possible, as I have been seen, the disguise option is not for me, but Fractal and others could get in that [Puebsec personal] way [possibly, not sure, correct me in that, but i thing with a disguise modiffer Fractals Con should get them in], they could do sabotage from the inside, like asking to be stationed in the security control centre

Ill wait outside, I will be of no use once inside, and there is no chance I should get my van there without breaking the fence and thus being shot at. Not that Im afraid of that, but still...Ill just wait for you to pick you up.

and

B) [ my thinking] taking out big amounts of guards could be done using odourless and colourless Stungas, as far as we know they they have no protection against that. if they see a sleeping guard on the ground, and no danger what would they do first? if they check up the guard they too will get knocked out so it would make for a good ambush weapon, if they are with no coms, visual traps we could make them jump into gas clouds.

I`m not sure, succesfull breaking means that guards didnt even notice you and there is no need of alarming them by using gas on them..If they found you, that is the other thing, but I would prefere if you can get in, set the charges, steal the goodies, call me, Ill break the fence, pick you up at some fire exit and gtfo...if you would not be able to walk away unnoticed completely

doubt we could do it without kicking some ass, stun damage prefered.
we need the loot and the sabotage to be one and the same break in, so i would say i will be defiantly discovered at least once.
p.s. our main goal is sabotage, not the loot.

C)My built in radar will give me real time Locations of people moving around at the cost of -2 modifer to all actions that need attention, so could use it while sneaking around the compound to avoid guards most of the time, [need camera layout-drone footage or security grid plan, to see them.]

I would provide you with close distance recon with SkyEye

Will you be able to provide me with locations of surveillance cameras?

D) I would intend to blow up their convener belt, servers, supplies, or anything else I can get my explosives on, right amount and places to do it without bringing the roof down should make no problems, helpfully.

What about timing of explosions? This would be great hit and ater that their security would go up 10 times. Are you able to hide charges good enought so the should be KABOOMed later?

Timed and radio, as needed, but i would like to get all the guards out of the place, hence the plan to incapacitate the most of them so we make no causalities
p.s. would be interesting if they have a central air conditioning where i could put the gas in, kinda easier to distribute

[Sentinemodo]

In fact, I can show our driver the exploit I used, since I probed the target (at least, Unwired says I may do so for a while). It does not appear to me as a good choice of action, but I may. Creating some new accounts and hiding them seem way more interesting.

But a question:
By Unwired rules, I may create a legit Account with a Software + Editing test, as I have security clearance. If I haven't, it would be a Hacking + Edit (2) test. Even though not having a security account would theoretically be more difficult, Fractal is more used to do things the wrong way (or, game-mechanically speaking, I have no Software skill and my hacking skill is enough for me to think it would be best if I had not the security account). So, what I'm wanting to ask is if I can take the test as if I haven't the security privilege, since it will benefit me at the time. Also, Unwired states this rules for creating an user account. For a security level access, we should raise it to 3, and for admin to 4. The thing is: this is for the hacking test (user without security privileges) or for the software test (security access or better)?

I will (I will post something IC before that, don't you freak) try to create this accounts, but I wanted them to be security or admin access. I just didn't really understand the rules for this. Someone can give its interpretation and clarify the question?

Sentinemodo, creeating user accounts is at the subitem backdoors, pg. 97.

I'll need to catch up on the rules, but for now - no test required - you may create user and security account, but both (yours and the new one) will be noted in the AccessLog, to change the AccessLog, you'd need admin account.

[Sichr]

Hell, that databomb scarries me. I cannot do anything with it. But...I think Ill leave this for Hackers, looking for peripheral devices and nodes:

Computer(3)+Analyze(5) (8d6.hits(5)=3)

[Sentinemodo]

In fact, I can show our driver the exploit I used, since I probed the target (at least, Unwired says I may do so for a while). It does not appear to me as a good choice of action, but I may. Creating some new accounts and hiding them seem way more interesting.

But a question:
By Unwired rules, I may create a legit Account with a Software + Editing test, as I have security clearance. If I haven't, it would be a Hacking + Edit (2) test. Even though not having a security account would theoretically be more difficult, Fractal is more used to do things the wrong way (or, game-mechanically speaking, I have no Software skill and my hacking skill is enough for me to think it would be best if I had not the security account). So, what I'm wanting to ask is if I can take the test as if I haven't the security privilege, since it will benefit me at the time. Also, Unwired states this rules for creating an user account. For a security level access, we should raise it to 3, and for admin to 4. The thing is: this is for the hacking test (user without security privileges) or for the software test (security access or better)?

I will (I will post something IC before that, don't you freak) try to create this accounts, but I wanted them to be security or admin access. I just didn't really understand the rules for this. Someone can give its interpretation and clarify the question?

Sentinemodo, creeating user accounts is at the subitem backdoors, pg. 97.

All right, I've completed catching up
Make a roll of Hacking + Edit (1 for user since you already have security account, 3 for security, 4 for admin) test to create the account.
If you fail, you may try to repeat, but at standard penalty for repeated attempts.

if you want to make it hidden make Hacking + Stealth (5, 10 minutes) Extended Test, you will complete this surely the test is only to measure the time taken

[Sentinemodo]

Hell, that databomb scarries me. I cannot do anything with it. But...I think Ill leave this for Hackers, looking for peripheral devices and nodes:

Computer(3)+Analyze(5) (8d6.hits(5)=3)

Make a visual perception roll please.

[Sentinemodo]

Hell, that databomb scarries me. I cannot do anything with it. But...I think Ill leave this for Hackers, looking for peripheral devices and nodes:

Computer(3)+Analyze(5) (8d6.hits(5)=3)

What is this roll taken from - could you point me to reference?

Forget it

[Sentinemodo]

Hell, that databomb scarries me. I cannot do anything with it.

You can always embrace it and set it off

[Sichr]

Come to daddy, come come to daddy



I can, but I dont want to risk those data would be destroyed

[Sichr]

OK what other do we have here...except that minefield?

Comp(3)+Analyze(5)+Hotsim(2) (10d6.hits(5)=4)

[Sentinemodo]

Nothing

Options:
1. All peripherals could be hardwired with wireless off
2. All inessential peripherals could be turned off
3. the active one could be hidden (but you've tested for it already during the day)

There are no wireless active/passive peripheral nodes within mutual signal range.

The guards employees must have some sort RFID, but they are not within mutual signal range.
You've seen on on the radar sensor output some items that should be visible - like rigged crane or rigged transporting vehicles - they aren't showing up.
The radio communication is performed using radio units, which are not matrix capable links. plain radio wave encrypted by the hardwired circuitry.

[Sichr]

Ahh...but from the node Im not looking for wifi connections but for All connections, if wired, it doesnt make the difference, once Im in...and I may even be able to turn them on