NEWS

Raising Magic after Essence Loss

  • 38 Replies
  • 12810 Views

hannibalisfun

  • *
  • Newb
  • *
  • Posts: 24
« on: <12-07-12/1458:52> »
I had a quick question.  After you had lost some essence,  when you raise your magic.  Are you paying for the the cost of raising it to the adjusted value or the per-adjusted?  For example,  if I had 3 magic after losing 2 essence.  Would I pay 20 Karma to raise my magic to 4 or would I pay 30 karma to raise my magic to 6 then still subtract the 2 magic from essence loss.  Mind as well ask this too.  Is my max magic still 6 or is it now 4?  If you could point me to the page where this is spelled out it would be appreciated too.

thanks

All4BigGuns

  • *
  • Prime Runner
  • *****
  • Posts: 7531
« Reply #1 on: <12-07-12/1501:44> »
This is a point of contention. There are those who believe that you would spend the 20 karma, and there are those who believe the other.  Personally, I prefer the latter, but I firmly believe there needs to be something to discourage all this "augmented adept" crap, and I think that could help.
(SR5) Homebrew Archetypes

Tangled Currents (Persistent): 33 Karma, 60,000 nuyen

Mäx

  • *
  • Ace Runner
  • ****
  • Posts: 1572
« Reply #2 on: <12-07-12/1537:30> »
This is a point of contention. There are those who believe that you would spend the 20 karma, and there are those who believe the other.  Personally, I prefer the latter, but I firmly believe there needs to be something to discourage all this "augmented adept" crap, and I think that could help.
I have never seen any rule support for the latter one.
"An it harm none, do what you will"

raggedhalo

  • *
  • Omae
  • ***
  • Posts: 709
« Reply #3 on: <12-07-12/1546:45> »
You raise your Magic to 5.  You have 2 points of 'ware installed.  Your Magic is now 3 for all intents and purposes.  You spend the 20 Karma to raise it to 4.  I'm not remotely convinced there is any contention, aside from people who want to houserule certain things to discourage augmented Awakened*.

*: which isn't to my personal taste, but is perfectly fine at others' tables.
Joe Rooney
Freelancer (Missions and otherwise: here's my stuff, plus CMP 2011-05 Burn Notice)

My Obsidian Portal profile

All4BigGuns

  • *
  • Prime Runner
  • *****
  • Posts: 7531
« Reply #4 on: <12-07-12/1558:43> »
You raise your Magic to 5.  You have 2 points of 'ware installed.  Your Magic is now 3 for all intents and purposes.  You spend the 20 Karma to raise it to 4.  I'm not remotely convinced there is any contention, aside from people who want to houserule certain things to discourage augmented Awakened*.

*: which isn't to my personal taste, but is perfectly fine at others' tables.

It could be fine if it were done just as part of a character idea, but the ones here who try to talk everyone into putting bio ware into Adepts (or even Hermetic Mages), don't do it for that. They only do it because they view characters as math problems.
(SR5) Homebrew Archetypes

Tangled Currents (Persistent): 33 Karma, 60,000 nuyen

emsquared

  • *
  • Ace Runner
  • ****
  • Posts: 1029
  • Super Perfundo
« Reply #5 on: <12-07-12/1605:40> »
Losing ESS decreases your MAG score, it does not augment it, therefore the prevailing interpretation is that you're paying on the new score which is in fact your actual score. Though if I were to GM, I'd probably house-rule it the other way (and I play an Augmented Adept).

And don't listen A4BG, he's just puckered because his "pure" Adepts can't hang with the big boys. ;)

JustADude

  • *
  • Prime Runner
  • *****
  • Posts: 3043
  • Madness? This! Is! A FORUM!
« Reply #6 on: <12-07-12/1922:09> »
You raise your Magic to 5.  You have 2 points of 'ware installed.  Your Magic is now 3 for all intents and purposes.  You spend the 20 Karma to raise it to 4.  I'm not remotely convinced there is any contention, aside from people who want to houserule certain things to discourage augmented Awakened*.

*: which isn't to my personal taste, but is perfectly fine at others' tables.

It could be fine if it were done just as part of a character idea, but the ones here who try to talk everyone into putting bio ware into Adepts (or even Hermetic Mages), don't do it for that. They only do it because they view characters as math problems.

So, how exactly does that justify lying about the rules when someone asks about the game mechanics?

You don't like Augmented Adepts, and want to make anyone who plays one suffer. Fine, if it's your table you can do what you want... though you're being a hypocrite considering all your posturing about Player Freedom... but don't pretend your House-Ruled nerf is anytging other than what it is... a House-Rule.
« Last Edit: <12-07-12/1924:05> by JustADude »
“What is right is not always popular and what is popular is not always right.”
― Albert Einstein

"Being average just means that half of everyone you meet is better than you."
― Me

FastJack

  • *
  • Administrator
  • Prime Runner
  • *****
  • Posts: 6422
  • Kids these days...
« Reply #7 on: <12-07-12/1943:29> »
All right, one warning has gone out already and JAD is getting close to another ban. Let's take a step back and focus on the discussion and not the persons.

Mithlas

  • *
  • Omae
  • ***
  • Posts: 919
« Reply #8 on: <12-07-12/2003:05> »
This is apparently a sticky issue, because the books don't explicitly say "you definitely pay karma as if you'd never lost any magic to essence". To the best of my knowledge, there is no absolutely certain "we'll point you to this page which explains it completely, applies this way in all situations to all people". There are a lot of arguments both ways, but I say it all winds down to this: it depends on your table.

You pay more karma than a "pure, no essence-reducing character" anyway, so I don't see it as being a necessity to say "costs must be what magic would be without essence reduction" - you pay more karma, and it seems easier in terms of book-keeping to me to look at your character sheet (with all of its eraser marks and scribbles) and say "a ha! This is what my magic is now". Pay to improve that to whatever the next one is without taking additional time to calculate what magic (or resonance, if you're considering Technomancers) would've been outside essence loss.

Let's say you're an adept with Magic 3. You get up to 1 Essence worth of 'ware. Your magic then is reduced to 2. You would have to pay 15 karma (5 times the new rating/level, which in this case is 3). If you want Magic 4, then you pay an additional 20 karma (5 times the new rating, now 4) and suck it up because you were the one who decided to get that 1 Essence worth of gear - of course, you can get a lot of value out of 1 or 2 essence of 'ware, so if you enjoy the numbers aspect of the game then enjoy the juggling. If not, then get just what you need and keep things simple so you can stick with what you enjoy, whether that be sneaking or punching corpsec in the face.

You're paying for your essence and your magic/resonance in either case, so I don't see it as game-breaking to go with "this is my magic now, not taking time to recalculate for essence". If the table you're at disagrees, discuss and see if everybody can come to a happy medium. If the majority feel one way, then for the sake of cohesion it's usually easier to say "okay folks, we'll go with it this way to cause the least amount of unhappiness".

JustADude

  • *
  • Prime Runner
  • *****
  • Posts: 3043
  • Madness? This! Is! A FORUM!
« Reply #9 on: <12-07-12/2008:07> »
Sorry, FastJack.

*ahem*

To move back on-topic, the rules specify that losing Essence reduces both your Magic Attribute and its Natural Maximum. Since the loss remains even if the Essence is repaired that means the reduction, as emsquared mentioned, isn't a modifier... which would be written as X(Y), as with Background Counts... but an actual change of the value of the Attribute, changing the value of X.

Speaking as a person who treats reading game rules as trying to turn a graphic artist's concept art into an engineering document, buying based on the cost of the new, reduced, Essence is the only reading rhat supports all available information.

Tables are always free to HR as they like, but the RAW is quite clear on the subject when the relevant information is parsed in its entirety.
« Last Edit: <12-07-12/2012:15> by JustADude »
“What is right is not always popular and what is popular is not always right.”
― Albert Einstein

"Being average just means that half of everyone you meet is better than you."
― Me

Falconer

  • *
  • Ace Runner
  • ****
  • Posts: 1112
« Reply #10 on: <12-07-12/2011:00> »
OP:
The only thing in the rules is to pay for the new score at whatever the new rating is.   The magic is lost and gone.   The rules don't care that your magic was 4 and reduced to 3... they only care that your current score is 3, and you'll pay (4x5)==20 karma to raise 3->4.

That said, magic loss can result in loss of initiations and metamagics if you're not careful.


And the rules are quite explicit... the karma cost to raise any attribute is (New Rating)x5.

It's the same bit for Technomancers... if their resonance is reduced permanently by essence loss or the like.  Any complex forms they know also degrade to their resonance value and also need to be rebought.  For adepts... any adept powers they have will also degrade down to a maximum of the reduced magic score and need to be bought back up.

Orvich

  • *
  • Chummer
  • **
  • Posts: 210
« Reply #11 on: <12-07-12/2016:04> »
Raising magic is already pretty darn pejorative, I generally would argue down any houserule or rules reading that increases the cost of more magic points, especially for adepts. In the rules, I seem to remember that losing essence specifically causes you to lose magic points entirely, not just the use of them. Therefore, I'd logic out that you aren't really at 5 anymore at all, because you've LOST that 5th point, bringing you to 4. In your example, down to 3.

Anyways, while another point of powers does unlock some interesting powers for the adept, it comes at quite an exorbitant price, especially considering the limited metamagics of use to the adept. In this example, to get back up to 4, you need to spend 20 karma (a fair chunk) for that 4th point. However, to attain the next point, you need to spend 38 karma! That's a quite big chunk of karma, to pick up a general benefit of what.. 4 dice to something, as a general rule (a lot of the non-utility increasing abilities seem to cost ~.25-.5 and provide +1 dice in applicable situations)?

And that's generally the only benefit more magic points provide, few of the (non mystic) adept powers use the magic pool for anything. This is unlike technomancers/resonance and mages/magic entirely, as both of those receive some (quite potent) benefits that scale directly to their attribute, like... threading or spellcasting itself.

I get that raising attributes is intended to be somewhat difficult (though it can be done quite easily with some relatively cheap ware), as it improves a potentially wide range of abilities, but making the adept's core progression (along their core mechanic, power points) follow an attribute that otherwise does them little (Mystic Adept) to no good at such a high cost is one of the few things that really feels off-kilter to me in the Shadowrun system. What that does is ensure that they get it softcapped or capped at chargen and never improve it over gameplay (or do so once), due to the high cost. 

According to the book, you'll get at least 2 karma per adventure (Which run more than a single session of gameplay, most likely), probably closer to 4-5 if you're a good player or are clever. Many people play any given character but once a week, which means that's a month of good solid progress for any single magic point increase if you're lucky, assuming (big one here) that you complete an entire adventure every week, and that you get 5 karma each and every week. If you aren't a good RP'er or player, and you're making close to the probable minimum (survival, and either you completed most objectives or you failed to do that because it was extra challenging) of 2-3. Now you're looking at months. Just seems.. not worth bothering with.

Anyways, rant about power points being based only on magic and how it encourages powerful starting specialist characters that don't grow aside, I'd go with the lower costing option. You've actually lost those points, and act entirely as if that IS your score. The other number is just there so that someone looking at your loss of essence can explain why you still have a positive magic score, but not a massive notoriety score without resorting to "You're cheating".
« Last Edit: <12-07-12/2017:41> by Orvich »

Thrass

  • *
  • Omae
  • ***
  • Posts: 841
« Reply #12 on: <12-08-12/0515:40> »
Orvich there are usefull meta magics for adepts and there is an optional rule that you can get another power point instead of meta magics for initiation as a mystic/adept.

Which means the first additional power point costs.... 13 karma, 10 with a 20% reduction.
While Adept Centering is one of my all time favorite meta magics.
Speech - Thought - Matrix
Characters: Andy - Andys rolls

Glyph

  • *
  • Ace Runner
  • ****
  • Posts: 1661
« Reply #13 on: <12-08-12/0531:44> »
I agree that you improve your Magic Attribute from the score that it has been reduced to - there is no support whatsoever for the other interpretation (although it can certainly be house ruled that way).

One thing to keep in mind, though, is that when you lose the point of Magic, you also have the maximum of your Magic Attribute reduced by one.  In other words, if you go from Magic: 4 to Magic: 3, 20 karma will raise it back up to 4 again.  But if you go from Magic: 6 to Magic: 5, you will need to initiate at least once, to improve your maximum Magic rating by one, before you can raise your Magic back up to 6.

farothel

  • *
  • Prime Runner
  • *****
  • Posts: 3859
« Reply #14 on: <12-08-12/0733:02> »
I would also work with the fact that you calculate from your current attribute, as noted on the character sheet, no matter how it got the value it currently is at.  In fact this is a very expensive option, as you have to re-buy your magic score to account for the 'ware you put in.  But that's the way to rules work.  But I wouldn't let them pay the higher price (say 25 karma to get magic from 3 to 4 because it was 4 before), as magical characters are enough of a karma sink already, in contrast to street sams and hackers, which are money sinks, but that's another discussion.

PS: if I recall correctly there is a way to get your essence back up after your 'ware is removed (some sort of gene therapy or other), but your magic stays permanently at the lower value unless you spent the karma to buy it back up.
"Magic can turn a frog into a prince. Science can turn a frog into a Ph.D. and you still have the frog you started with." Terry Pratchett
"I will not yield to evil, unless she's cute"

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk