Wyrm
Wait, what? How does anything I said "punctuate" your argument? What is your argument, really? At this point, you've lost me entirely...
Also, what the what? So, just because a source book is written by someone you seem to dislike* you're ready to discount an aspect of the game that has been around since the 1st fraggin' Edition? Don't get me wrong, I like you, but that is to my mind a rather absurd stance, and not remotely deserving of you.
* And I'll be honest, I had never even heard the name Carl Sargent because I really don't care who writes these books (sorry, past and current writers, but it's true; please do keep it up, though, and I'll keep buying them! 
Also, also, Project Imago is decidedly not the "only thing" that is canonically outside the bounds of meshing Magic and Technology.
First of all, no one really understands what the hell Technomancy really is, though I do seem to recall that you're vehemently opposed to even the idea that it could somehow be related to magic, so let's just leave that one alone for now, I've got plenty of other references.
Cybermancy, for example, is very clearly described in Augmentation as "a multidisciplinary science that merges magical arts, advanced medical techniques, and sophisticated cybernetics". That one line defies your argument that Project Imago is the only thing outside the bounds, as it says so right there;
"merges magical art, advanced medical techniques, and sophisticated cybernetics".
Furthermore, and also in Augmentation, the process of Revitalization is described as a way to restore lost Essence "by genetically remodeling DNA to repair damage to the aura or balance to the body’s systems" in order to perform some sort of "genetic Feng Shui"; again, clearly using known (or at least theorized in the modern world) scientific methods to achieve a desired result which in this case just happens to include "restoring" the "soul", as you yourself called it, of a human being. To me, that reads like a scientific method with mystical, if not magical, results, but as always, the specific details are shrouded in mystery.
In Storm Front, it is specifically mentioned that "a large part of " the formula for Blue-227, the biochemical weapon used as part of Aztech's Operation: Marauder to bring down Sirrurg, is magically based, which the observers (The Smiling Bandit and his unnamed colleague) find to be "a mystery, because it's not necessary for the overall formula". Again, just a tiny hint, but it's there, and just like the AMP, "it works".
I could go on, but these examples are just what I could come up with off the top of my head. The real mystery to me is this:
If you really believe that the current writers fully intend for there to not even be the slightest chance of overlap between magic and technology (please do correct me if this is not what you're trying to say), then how in the seven hells do you explain that a completely different set of writers than those who wrote the original Imago* chose to continue the in-game reference to not only Project Imago but Eliohann himself by allowing him to survive into the 2070s as an e-ghost** in the Matrix, with Celedyr seemingly equally happy to let him continue on with his crack-brained research into a dragon-machine interface? Even if I accepted that Carl Sargent's writing should be dismissed "just because you say so" (and that's what it sounds like to me), the current writers could very easily have dismissed this particular vein of the lore as simply a fluke, but they didn't.
To reiterate, instead of having manatech go the way of the dodo bird, the writers actively included the continuation and expansion of Project Imago into a 4th Edition adventure book, hinted at a magical base in the formula of Blue-227 which disabled a fraggin' dragon(!), introduced Revitalization***, (re-)re-introduced cybermancy, and showcased e-ghost or elints (or whatever the cause of CFD turns out to be) who are able to use the magical talents of their Awakened "hosts" to blow the Society of the Phoenix Rising New Years Eve party halfway to high heaven.
* Imago is copyrighted 1992 in the publication I have, at least, so I presume it was published around that time ** He's confirmed to be the digital entity known as Cerberus at least as of Corporate Intrigue*** At least I don't personally know of Revitalization existing as of 3rd EditionBut, since you've brought it up, and since I've been called upon this before, I'm going to follow CanRay's advice from a thread earlier this year:
as such, I believe that <insert belief here> is staying within the intention of the designers who created the ruleset, and not "handwaving" anything.
As such, maybe talk to said writer! I'm right here!
<znip>
CanRay! Would you mind weighing in on this one, please? From an official-like point of view and stuff; there's cookies in it for you...
Much obliged.